(This month's Research Round-Up features three reports that address a wide range of issues relevant to marketing. Two of the reports (by Benchmarkit and NielsenIQ) are based on surveys designed to capture the perspective and practices of marketers. The paper by WPP Media is based on an analysis of the firm's extensive database of purchase journeys.)
"2026 Brand vs Demand Benchmark Report" by Benchmarkit
![]() |
| Source: Benchmarkit |
- Based on a survey of individuals working at 168 B2B technology companies
- The job title or job role of respondents was not provided
- Respondents were affiliated with companies having annual revenue of less than $5 million to more than $500 million
- The survey was conducted throughout September and October, 2025
The primary objective of this research was to benchmark how marketing budgets and other resources are currently allocated and would ideally be allocated between demand generation marketing and brand and awareness marketing. The survey also addressed current measurement practices and respondents' views on several related issues.
Here are some of the major findings from this research.
- Respondents reported that they are currently allocating 70% (median) of their total marketing budget to demand generation and 25% (median) to brand marketing.
- Respondents said their ideal budget allocation would be 50% (median) to demand generation and 40% (median) to brand marketing.
- The two metrics most frequently used to measure demand generation performance are the dollar value of pipeline generated (79% of respondents) and the number of opportunities created (70%).
- 73% of the respondents said that brand building is a long-term investment that makes demand generation marketing more efficient, and 63% said brand investments directly fuel demand generation performance.
- But . . . only 28% of the respondents said their company can link brand investments and activity to pipeline generated.
![]() |
| Source: NielsenIQ |
- Based on a survey of ". . . more than 250 CMOs and senior marketing decision-makers from influential companies across regions, industries, and organizational sizes . . ."
- Also based on qualitative interviews of ". . . chief marketing officers (CMOs) across industries . . ."
- A detailed description of the research methodology is not provided
- The guide does not indicate when the survey and interviews were conducted
NielsenIQ (NIQ) (formerly known as AC Nielsen) is a market research firm that primarily focuses on consumer research. However, NIQ's "CMO Outlook: Guide to 2026" describes several research findings that are relevant for B2B marketing leaders.
For example, NIQ's survey and interviews revealed a growing tension between the pursuit of long-term vs. short-term marketing goals.
- 69% of NIQ's survey respondents said their CEO and CFO believe in the value of long-term brand building, but this was down sharply from 80% in last year's NIQ research.
- 55% of the survey respondents said they were allocating 60% or more of their marketing budget to long-term brand building. That was down slightly from 59% in last year's research.
Other interesting findings from NIQ's 2026 guide include:
- When asked where their organization was performing well, 39% of the survey respondents said media planning and optimization, 37% said content/creative generation, 35% said understanding customers, and 35% said measuring ROI.
- 58% of the survey respondents said they are using up to 5 tools to measure media performance, and another 34% said they are using 6 to 15 tools.
- When asked what methods they use to measure marketing ROI, 81% of the survey respondents said marketing attribution, and 77% said marketing mix modeling.
"How Humans Decide: What Drives Consumer Choice and How Brands Should Respond" by WPP Media (in association with the University of Oxford's Said Business School)
- Based on an analysis of WPP Media's database of 1.2 million purchase journeys
- The WPP Media database covers purchases in over 200 product categories in 47 countries
- The white paper provides a detailed description of the research and analysis methodology in the Appendix (page 9)
- The white paper was published in October 2025
The central argument of this white paper is that knowing how people make buying decisions is essential to understanding how brands grow. The researchers describe the essence of their study findings early in the white paper.
"When the complexities of human decision-making are understood, the missing pieces of the equation are revealed: influence and receptivity. Once influence and receptivity are understood, any assumptions that consumers are equally influenceable, or that media channels are interchangeable tools for reaching them, no longer make sense." (Emphasis in original)
Here are a few of the study's major findings.
- 84% of purchases involve people choosing brands they're already biased towards before they begin shopping.
- The proportion of purchases that are governed by this bias varies across product categories, but never falls below 70%
- Receptivity is a measure of how likely a person is to be influenced by marketing messages. On average, unreceptive consumers make up 23% of all category buyers.
- On average, owned, shared, and earned touchpoints (such as word-of-mouth recommendations and customer reviews) are nearly 3 times more powerful than paid media alone at converting a consumer from bias to purchase.




No comments:
Post a Comment